At a Glance
| Detail | BRYTER | Clarilis |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Doc Automation | Doc Automation |
| Total raised | $88M | $11.8M |
| Rounds tracked | 3 | 2 |
| Latest round | Series B, $66M · Apr 2021 | Series B, $7.8M · Aug 2020 |
| Last valuation | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Lead investors | Tiger Global Management, Accel, Dawn Capital, Notion Capital | NVM Private Equity |
| Built for | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Headquarters | Germany | United Kingdom |
Funding, Side by Side
BRYTER rounds
- Apr 2021Series B$66M
- Jun 2020Series A$16M
- Nov 2019Seed$6M
Clarilis rounds
- Aug 2020Series B$7.8M
- Jul 2018Undisclosed$4M
Our Take
We have not tested these two head to head yet. The numbers above come from public funding announcements. If you use either one, tell us what you found and it may become a Field Note.
Quick Answers
- Which has raised more, BRYTER or Clarilis?
- BRYTER has raised $88M in disclosed funding, compared with $11.8M for Clarilis.
- Do BRYTER and Clarilis share investors?
- No. None of the investors we track have backed both companies.
- What is BRYTER best for?
- No-code legal automation.
- What is Clarilis best for?
- Document automation for law firms.
Source: Legal Tech Circle funding data, from public announcements. Updated November 11, 2026.