Case Status vs Laurel
At a Glance
| Detail | Case Status | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Practice Mgmt | Practice Mgmt |
| Total raised | $29.7M | $100M |
| Rounds tracked | 4 | 1 |
| Latest round | Series B, $19.7M · Oct 2024 | Series C, $100M · Jun 2025 |
| Last valuation | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Lead investors | Grayhawk Capital, Topmark Partners, Panoramic Ventures, Meeting Street Capital | IVP |
| Built for | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Headquarters | United States | United States |
Funding, Side by Side
Case Status rounds
- Oct 2024Series B$19.7M
- Dec 2022Series B$5M
- Jan 2022Series A$3.5M
- Mar 2020Seed$1.5M
Laurel rounds
- Jun 2025Series C$100M
Our Take
We have not tested these two head to head yet. The numbers above come from public funding announcements. If you use either one, tell us what you found and it may become a Field Note.
Quick Answers
- Which has raised more, Case Status or Laurel?
- Laurel has raised $100M in disclosed funding, compared with $29.7M for Case Status.
- Do Case Status and Laurel share investors?
- No. None of the investors we track have backed both companies.
- What is Case Status best for?
- Client communication app for law firms.
- What is Laurel best for?
- AI timekeeping for law and accounting firms.
Source: Legal Tech Circle funding data, from public announcements. Updated November 10, 2026.