Why It Matters
Courts in the US, UK, Ireland and elsewhere have accepted TAR for more than a decade. Generative AI review tools are now being added alongside it, and the same questions apply: how was it validated and how is quality measured.
Litigation & eDiscovery Companies
EverlawEverlaw is a cloud eDiscovery platform with AI tools for litigation and investigations.
DISCODISCO provides cloud eDiscovery software and review services for law firms and legal departments.
EnterEnter is a Brazilian AI platform that runs high-volume litigation for corporate legal departments.
StenoSteno provides court reporting and litigation support services, including deposition transcripts, for litigators.
DarrowDarrow uses AI to search public documents for potential legal violations and brings those…
LogikcullLogikcull is cloud eDiscovery and legal hold software for disputes, subpoenas and investigations.
Related Terms
- CAL (continuous active learning)
- A form of technology-assisted review, sometimes called TAR 2.0, in which the model keeps learning from every reviewer decision and continually re-ranks the remaining documents.
- Predictive coding
- An earlier name for technology-assisted review, where a model trained on attorney-coded samples predicts the relevance of the remaining documents.
- Machine learning
- Software that learns patterns from examples rather than following hand-written rules. It powered legal tech well before generative AI, for example in technology-assisted review.
General information, not legal advice. Part of the Legal Tech Glossary, 173 terms in plain English.