# Harvey Brings a Fact Graph to Litigation Teams

> At FORUM Chicago, Harvey previewed a fact graph for disputes and investigations, Outlook agents and a two-way iManage sync. Most of it is still early access.

By The Circle Desk | Market Signals | Published 2026-11-07
Source: https://legaltechcircle.com/insights/harvey-fact-graph-litigation-imanage/

Harvey used its FORUM Chicago event on November 5 to show where it wants to
go next: fewer cold prompts and more agents that already know the matter.
The company's [keynote recap](
https://www.harvey.ai/blog/forum-chicago-product-announcements) says more
than 500 leaders from law firms, in-house teams and the wider legal market
attended. The headline for litigators was a new [fact graph for disputes,
litigation and investigations](
https://www.harvey.ai/blog/fact-graph-for-litigation-disputes-internal-investigations),
shown publicly for the first time.

Harvey also said its agents are now in Outlook, that a new Intake product
for in-house teams is in early access, and that it has built a two-way
integration with iManage. Only the Outlook add-in is something a firm can
turn on today. The rest is waitlist or "early access soon," which matters
when you are deciding what to budget for.

## What the Fact Graph Is Supposed to Do

Harvey describes the fact graph as a way to find and connect facts across
millions of documents. Per the company, it pulls facts out of each
document, links each one back to the exact line of text, and connects them
to the people, events and issues they concern, even when the related facts
sit years apart in the record.

The part Harvey leans on hardest is that the record keeps growing. As new
documents come in, the fact graph is meant to extract new information,
connect it to what is already there and flag inconsistencies. Teams can
then turn that record into chronologies, witness outlines, deposition memos
and hearing prep, and Harvey says it will flag where earlier work product
has gone stale.

Harvey says litigators already make up a third of its customer base and
often hit a "cold start problem" of rebuilding the facts for each new task.
The fact graph is being built with design partners, and early access is
open through a waitlist. Harvey has not published pricing, accuracy figures
or names of the design partners, so none of the performance claims have
been tested outside the company.

## The Rest of the Keynote

The fact graph sits inside what Harvey calls Harvey Graph, a map of matter
and project context its agents share so they can hand work to each other
without rebuilding it. CEO Winston Weinberg framed the goal as legal AI
moving "from a tool you prompt to a team that you run."

> "Think about the best manager you've ever had. They gave you proactive
guidance on what to do and context on how to do it. That's what we're
building into our agents: context and control, so they operate the way you
and your team do every step of the way." Winston Weinberg, Harvey

The Outlook agents triage and file email by matter, draft replies, propose
fixes to scheduling conflicts and can start a first pass review when a new
draft lands. Harvey says nothing is sent, filed or changed without the user
seeing it first.

For in-house teams, Intake takes a contract request straight from the email
the business sends to legal, gathers deal background and past contracts,
asks the requester follow-up questions in the same thread and routes the
work to a Contract Review Agent and the right lawyer. Harvey says the
redlines trace back to the team's own precedents and standards.

The iManage news may matter most to large firms. Harvey says context will
flow from iManage into Harvey, finished work will flow back, iManage stays
the system of record, and the ethical wall policies a firm keeps in iManage
will be enforced inside Harvey. [TokenPost's report](
https://www.tokenpost.com/news/technology/50658) notes that Harvey's
Connector Library, which already includes iManage, became generally
available on October 21. The two-way sync itself is not yet in early access.

## Why This Looks Familiar

If this sounds like the evidence tools litigation vendors have been
shipping, it is. A week earlier, Everlaw launched Omni with Case Memory,
which pulls facts from complaints, depositions and other matter documents
into a central fact library, according to [Everlaw's October 28 release](
https://www.everlaw.com/press/release/everlaw-omni-and-workflows-agentic-intelligence-review-automation/).
Everlaw's pitch is that it holds the evidence and lets outside AI tools,
Harvey included, reach in.

Harvey's pitch runs the other way: keep the fact record inside the AI
platform and pull documents in from wherever they live. Litigation teams
that already run review in a dedicated platform will want to know which
system they are expected to treat as the source of truth for facts, and
what happens to that record when a matter moves between vendors.

## Common Questions

**Can firms use the fact graph today?**

Not broadly. Harvey says it is building the fact graph with design partners
and that early access is open through a waitlist.

**Is the iManage two-way sync live?**

No. Harvey says the integration has been built and will be in early access
soon. Read access to iManage through Harvey's connectors already exists.

**What is available now?**

The Outlook agents. Harvey says users can try them by turning on the
Outlook add-in.

## Verdict

**Partly Real.** The Outlook agents ship today and the iManage design
choices, especially enforcing ethical walls, answer a real large firm
worry. The fact graph is the most interesting piece and the least proven,
with no pricing, no outside testing and only a waitlist so far.

*QUINN ASHBY*Staff Writer, Legal Tech Circle

e. quinn@lionfiregroup.co
w. www.lionfiregroup.co

---
Legal Tech Circle (https://legaltechcircle.com/). News and analysis, not legal advice.